data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6701a/6701a689455294e4c49944fbc0e886d975a4d65a" alt="Intel gpus"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73742/737429dec14b1ca1dce80be45d9774af240d0c33" alt="intel gpus intel gpus"
The former is said to be an equivalent of Nvidia’s 50-watt GTX 1650, while the latter is compared to the RTX 3050 with 35 watts. The difference between the two is that the Phoenix APU’s integrated GPU comes with 12 compute units (CUs), whereas the Strix Point features 16 CUs. The YouTuber pins the Meteor Lake chip somewhere between the Phoenix 45W and the Strix Point 45W with RDNA3+ graphics. AMD places the 128-EU chip conveniently behind the Ryzen 7000 Phoenix APU, but Moore’s Law Is Dead claims that its performance may actually be better than AMD hopes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c3ba/5c3ba96b494d27f9080130ec97f601f85b2ce127" alt="intel gpus intel gpus"
The Meteor Lake chip comes with 128 execution units (EUs), but Wccftech reveals that there will also be a weaker design with 64 EUs. It also includes a prediction regarding a 45-watt Meteor Lake Chip. Moore’s Law Is Dead shows a slide from the presentation that talks about the performance of AMD’s own 45-watt Phoenix APU with an RDNA 3 GPU. Funnily enough, the exciting update on Meteor Lake’s iGPU comes not from Intel, but from an internal presentation from AMD.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6701a/6701a689455294e4c49944fbc0e886d975a4d65a" alt="Intel gpus"